Thursday, September 30, 2010

Gokart Frames In Houston

...prima o poi ritorno...


Football Cake Diagram

call for 2 ponies

We need to find a house with 2 male neutered pony, palomino and chestnut color of
of about 11 years. They are docile and affectionate nature
and are accustomed to being together. Anyone
available, is invited to write to the contact details leaving bairos@tin.it
Telephone.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

2 Seater Sand Cars For Sale

Welcome to the MOB

Consume the last two summer dates of Bolero Tour 2010, for which we sincerely thank The Stable Domestic for the organization and the extraordinary reception, we got a little 'working on the project MOB. The factory has taken shape and substance, and there are permanent, meanwhile, important news on the front of the web. Therefore, I urge you to visit the main blog of Factory and her profile ReverbNation ; if you are Facebook users, you can join the new group FB . projects in the network are: Fuximile , and Newton's apple , Davide Ravera Band and Zeder ; by the end of November is expected to be submitted and official material of this important new raid group.

Friday, September 17, 2010

How Much Money Is A Pearl Necklace

Kissexy Lesa quoted by the magazine "Rolling Stone"

The concert of Kissexy Lesa August 1 has been reported in an article by Filippo Casaccia the Italian edition of Rolling Stone magazine, Number 83 September 2010 (cover is Patti Smith), now on newsstands! On page 35 is about a little girl, Sophie (the daughter of Philip) began the world of "live rock and roll" at our concert. Here's an excerpt: "... this summer I spotted a sign announcing the KISSEXY in concert at Lesa on Lake Maggiore. For Sofia real thing or tribute band, and it makes no difference to 21:30 of August 1, fitted caps and after an afternoon nap forced the door to the sports field where Barbara, Sara, Elena and Sergio (guitar solo is male privilege) pay their tribute to the women's band Stanley & Simmons. The KISSEXY get along amiably with classical , make up the faithful, want to have fun and a bigmouth bass player who spits blood as it is a must ... "

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Cubefield Cheat Fixed

alternated in the Advisory Group in the Heart of Lesa. Monica Rhodes comes out and enters Mario Conterio

The leader Gianni Lucini had somehow made it clear during the meeting of the Public May 20, when he said: '... Councillors up to us to respond especially to the voters of our mandate and maybe have some rotation if you think you might otherwise give our contribution. Today more than ever a sense of civic commitment in building a more just society ignores the institutional positioning. Being directors is a role, but it is not the only possible in a community of people active and engaged Lesa as in the Heart. . Already at the outset of Mauritius Tagini, outgoing director and confirmed he had preferred to leave your seat to Tiziana Tozzi engaging in the construction of the Association and of the newspaper. In recent days, Monica Rhodes resigned from the office of Councillor Hall with a note points out that "... such a decision, due to recruitment of other responsibilities and personal duties, as happened with the resignation of Maurizio Tagini Rotates the list of those elected in the Heart of Lesa. The undersigned will continue its commitment in the Association Lesa in the Heart. " Took his place in the Council Municipal Mario Conterio.

Free 2 Man Go Kart Plans

aminal experiments: response Oreste Rossi

Directive aminal experiments with the new law: response
Oreste Rossi
Sorry to have been subjected to gratuitous insults to people
in bad faith, or uninformed with regard to the vow I
expressed on this directive.

Existing legislation in most European countries is incomplete and no respect
about the animals used for scientific purposes. Among the changes introduced in
text as finally approved, I would stress that
research and promote alternative methods of pain relief
inflicted on guinea pigs (90% are mice), it reduces the use of primates, which can be tested
only when it is
scientifically proven impossible to use alternative techniques, we classify the severity
procedures and ensure regular inspections without notice
least 1 / 3 of the laboratories each year.
is obvious to anyone who informs
that this new legislation identifies a balance between the
animal protection and the need for scientific research.

is clear that if you have to test new drugs or treatment techniques
certainly can not be done using humans.

What I wonder and I ask those who have covered me with insults and threats, as
never have been felt with the same intensity and virulence, to
as the ritual slaughter, this practice is perfectly useless
, which involves the slaughtering of live animals for religious reasons
. Perhaps 30 minutes of agony that animals suffer
slaughtered by ritual slaughter
not weigh on the consciences of so-called animal rights?
also analyzes the legislative process
Directive, I would like to recall that the first reading was approved
in the previous legislature, and members from other
current ones, with one vote (31 March 2009) in the Agriculture Committee, which
followed the approval by an overwhelming majority in
plenary session in Strasbourg, May 5, 2009 with 540 votes in favor,
66 contrari e 34 astensioni.
Nel quadro della procedura di codecisione
il Consiglio ha poi approvato la posizione comune il 3 giugno 2010.
Tale testo é stato in seguito approvato in seconda lettura dalla
Commissione Agricoltura del Parlamento europeo, senza nessuna modifica
a larghissima maggioranza da tutti i gruppi politici, il 12 luglio 2010
con 28 voti a favore, 4 astenuti e 0 contrari.
Ultimo passaggio, l’
approvazione definitiva lo scorso 8 settembre durante la sessione
plenaria a Strasburgo, anche in questo caso a larghissima maggioranza.
Per completezza d'informazione e di chiarezza, vi indico il link che vi
permetterà di avere l’intero ciclo di vita della proposta directive,
its contents, its innovations and changes over time
, so you can see the improvements (for animals)
made by this new directive from the previous year. Oreste Rossi

Getting Smell From Projector Screen

FederFauna Guberti deposits exposed on the case and the way to animalistopoli

POLITICALLY CORRECT
September 15, 2010

FederFauna
deposits exposed on the case and the way to Guberti "animalistopoli"


on animal welfare and economic interests and power masked by those bandied about in defense
animali.7 of the Prosecutor, 29 pages
exposed, 462 attachments, videos and a CD with lots of photos
, 10 people called to testify directly, more '
all those who want to hear the magistrates. These are the numbers exposed last
deposited by FederFauna
have been committed by the end of December 2008 to present, on the case of livestock pointer
Del Vento di Ravenna and the many doubts raised about the management of animal seizure and
by officials of the Forestry and
animal welfare groups. The complaint, together with other numerous acts
judicial colleagues, including complaints and lawsuits filed in recent months
, could bring together into one big investigation that someone has already
'baptized' animalistopoli. Recall
including the complaint filed in early June by MEP Sergio Berlato for
report the involvement of the animalistic
in trafficking of illegal
stray dogs from Italy and abroad that filed in July by the Hunters
Lombardi, again with FederFauna in
about the economic benefits of a non-profit animal welfare organizations
compared with their positions and initiatives that have little utility
of 'social (also based on the questions of Senator
Valerio Carrara). Those acts, on the whole, aim to shed light on
economic interests and power, by so many associations
animals, which are hidden under those ballyhooed
in defense of animals, and to report crimes, that to bring benefits to anyone,
produce damage or injustice to many honest citizens and
no real benefit to the animals. The announcement on the case dell'esposto
Guberti, a case that has also generated several questions from MPs
UDC, the PDL and the Northern League, is just before
to come back before the Senate a draft bill called "ratification

of the European Convention on pets in 1987, "which has little
ratification since the Italian law in over twenty years
reached more than suggestions, but will propose an amendment to the Criminal Code
. This change would equalize for
gravity 'an intentional offense to manslaughter in a case of maltreatment of animals and
thus make even more 'easy to seize animals
property' to be assigned to animal welfare groups, which may also require
maintenance costs (no limit set
) who suffered the seizure. As for complaints,
light of the numerous well-known names that contain, among them those of
people being part of public administration and also considering the gravity of the crimes
on which they want to light, and FederFauna is 'already' proposal
to organize some short press conferences.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Examples Of A Church Welcome

Vivisection: the list of signatories

UNITA '


Vivisection September 13, 2010
voted the new directive on animal testing.

1-
Gabriele Albertini (PDL) 2-Robert
ANGELILLI (PDL) 3-
Alfredo Antoniozzi (PDL)
4 -
Raffaele Baldassarre (PDL)
5-Paolo Bartolozzi (PDL) 6-Sergio
BERLATO
( PDL)
7-Vito Bonsignore (PDL)
8-Antonio CANCIAN (PDL) 9-John

COLLINO (PDL)
Lara 10-COMI (PDL) 11-Carlo
girlfriend (PDL)
12 - Elisabetta Gardini
( PDL)
13-Salvatore Iacolino (PDL) 14-John

LA VIA (PDL)
15-Barbara Matera (PDL)
16-Mario MAURO (PDL) 17-

Erminia Mazzoni (PDL)
Alfredo 18-BALL (PDL)
19-Aldo Patriciello (PDL)
20 -
Licia RONZULLI (PDL) 21-
Salatto Potito (PDL)
22-Amalia SARTORI (PDL) 23-Mark Scurr
(PDL)
24-Francesco Paolo Sergio Silvestris (PDL )
25 - Salvatore
TATARELLA (PDL)
26-This Mortal Coil (PDL)?
27-Mara BIZZOTTO
(Lega Nord)
28-Mario Borghezio (Lega Nord)
29-FONTANA Lorenzo (Lega Nord
)
30-Claudio Morganti (Lega Nord)
31-Fiorello PROVERA (Lega Nord
)
32 Orestes-RED (Lega Nord)
33-Matteo Salvini (Lega Nord)
34 -
Giancarlo Scotti (Lega Nord)
35-Francesco Enrico Speroni (Northern League) 36-Sergio Gaetano
COFFER (PD)
37-Luigi Berlinguer (PD) 38-Paul

DE CASTRO (PD)
39-Roberto Gualtieri (PD) 40-
Pier Antonio Panzeri (PD)
41-Mario Pirillo (PD)
42-Gianni PITTELLA (PD ) 43-
Vittorio Prodi (PD) 44-David-Maria
SASSOLI (PD) 45-
Carlo Casini (UDC)
46-Antonello
Antinori (UDC)
47-Luigi Ciriaco De Mita (UDC)
48-Vincent IOVINE
(IDV)
49-Pino ARLACCHI (IDV)
50-DORFMANN Herbert (SVP) 51-

Clemente Mastella (EDU) 52-
Magdi Cristiano Allam (I Love Italy) "



THE JOURNAL September 13, 2010


Animal Testing, the infamous
conditional

Caro dottor Granzotto, rispondendo alla lettrice Isabella
D’Onofrio lei si impegnò a «spulciare» il sito Internet del Parlamento
europeo per stanare i «disonorevoli» che hanno votato la direttiva
sulla sperimentazione sugli animali, cani e gatti randagi in
particolare. Nel caso avesse avuto successo, fornirebbe a noi lettrici
e lettori amanti degli animali i risultati della sua ricerca?
e-mail
Sì, certo, gentile lettrice, anche se non sono molto soddisfatto dei
risultati. Resta confermato in base all’articolo 11 paragrafo 1 secondo
comma della risoluzione, che su rane, topi, porcellini d’India,
criceti, gerbilli della Mongolia, primates (obviously non-human),
dogs and cats are allowed to experiment and "basic research and for
treatment of disease, the effectiveness of the drugs, the higher education
and forensic investigations." Then we read that "because
antecedents of animals in the stray and feral
of domestic species are not known and their capture and detention in
establishments increases the anxiety, they should not be used
procedures." The use of the hypocrite, mascalzonesco conditional
place of this target obviously leaves a free hand and therefore I see
bad for dogs and cats. And speaking of conditional
Listen to this: "The methods chosen should, where possible, avoid

death as end point due to the severe suffering caused."
thus giving for granted the suffering, death
should be avoided "as far as possible." But can you? The seal in a directive
carelessly, all smoke and no roast that good intentions into practice
leave the field open to experimentation, "hard" animal
is the final recommendation: "To enable the competent authorities to monitor compliance with this
Directive, if possible
each establishment should maintain accurate records on the number of animals, their origin and their
fate. " If possible. It should. But at this point could not
, MEPs, summarize the law in a simple
simple: "Do whatever you want"?
However, it went how it went,
kind friend, to the satisfaction of European ladies and gentlemen, the resolution is passed
great. Impossible, despite his continual references to transparency
, get it from the European Union
the details of the vote. To tell the truth, not even the final result
, how many "yes", how many "no" and those who "abstained" (let alone the
number of people in attendance, probably because, as usual,
deserted). So we must be content with explanations of vote
of our five MEPs. By voting "yes" Mr Giancarlo
Scott, the league added that the text of the resolution "
find a balance that allows you to use methods that cause the least pain possible
. Others who voted "yes" is Paolo De Castro,
the Democratic Party, which also barred the way for parliamentary
as requiring further review of the text.
Elisabetta Gardini, pidiellina out, he voted "yes" because "unfortunately, the rice

rca animal remains paramount." A "no" came from
dipietrina Sonia Alfano who had asked for, unheard, the postponement of
text ("the experiment that allows for teaching and re-use of animals
sometimes using methods that cause pain) in
Parliamentary Commission. Finally Christian Muscardini pidiellina too, has expressed
Classroom hope that the resolution be revised soon to
"stop unnecessary testing and repetitive exercise."
would seem a 'no', but it could be a "yes" with reservations.


GEA PRESS

13 September 2010

Directive vivisection. The near-mea culpa 's
MEP Pino Arlacchi.

GEAPRESS - Swamped
thousands of email messages, MEPs who voted in favor of vivisection
Directive on 8 September to the European Parliament,
try to defend themselves. Who to blame relies unlikely
parliamentary process, as the case of Mr Pittella, those who defended the goodness
points to the animal rights lobby, unfortunately that is the true
, as did Paolo De Castro, who instead called into play the '
ignorance on the subject and the favorable vote on the same Verdi
final text (we think that the Hon. Arlacchi relates to what the
exempted by the Commission). We propose in the response text
Hon. Arlacchi the (PD ). A further confirmation
of what happened in Parliament as reported in 'shock interview
GeaPress issued by the Hon. the Sonia Alfano.
Rome, 10 set.2010
Pino Arlacchi
"
I received some hate mail on my vote in the European Parliament about the motion
regulating vivisection. And I say now that I have a
po'sottovalutato the issue, relying on the assessment
of my group (ALDE, Democrats and liberals in Europe), without further
's argument with a personal investigation. But before
communicate to my readers and voters
which would be my position if I had been alerted of an impending vote
so "sensitive" and, more importantly, what will my
future direction on the same subject, since the matter is just
all 'beginning of a journey, let me tell you how things went in court
Wednesday scorso.Quando case has come to
vivisection question, a couple of Members have requested the floor to ask
, an imprint of regulation, not a vote for or against
vivisection, but the simple reference text
the Commission that he had fired for the final opinion.

clarify this point is crucial, because if it were to express an opinion Dry
I would definitely vote against vivisection, because I think una
pratica inaccettabile, crudele, e non più indispensabile per l’
avanzamento della medicina.
Davanti a me avevo la lista di voto del mio
gruppo, che indicava un voto favorevole al provvedimento. Sono
contrario ai colpi di mano in seduta plenaria, perché sono una tecnica
che sfrutta gli aspetti più deteriori del sistema parlamentare, ed è
adottata in prevalenza dai demagoghi e dai furbetti che tentano di
rovesciare l’esito prevedibile di un provvedimento approfittando di
circostanze fortuite quali la distrazione o la disinformazione dei
deputati, le assenze momentanee dall’ aula, la confusione che si crea
in particolari momenti e che induce alcuni parlamentari even
wrong button (do not be surprised, I checked out the person who
what has happened to fellow players in key votes).
L '
intervention of the chairman of the committee, De Castro,
has also reduced my uncertainty of the issue had been discussed for over a year in
Commission, and the final text was approved
also by the Greens, now they inexplicably took
distances. It would not be serious by the Parliament
disregard of a sudden the work done by its members. The text is

was finally approved, but the possibility of returning to the theme with a
position clearer, di abolizione delle pratiche più degradanti e
dolorose di sperimentazione scientifica sugli animali, è aperta, anzi
apertissima. E il sottoscritto sarà in questo caso in prima fila n ella
battaglia per i diritti delle specie animali”.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Homemade Lead Fishing Mold Forums

Everything you wanted to know about the 'Directive vivisection "but have not dared to ask

IL LEVANTE 12 SETTEMBRE 2010
Tutto ciò che volevate sapere sulla «direttiva vivisezione» ma non avete osato chiedere
di Chiara De Capitani
E' difficile scrivere e giudicare obbiettivamente un tema sensibile come i test
scientifici sugli animali. Ad alcune ore di distanza dall’approvazione
della direttiva 86/609[1] sull'utilizzazione degli animali for scientific purposes
possessed numerous articles have appeared on
social networks, newspapers large and small print, often with the aim
exploit the sensitivity of the readers. The article Repubblica.it
entitled "Vivisection, the EU directive" Yes to stray as guinea pigs [2] '
after only five hours of publication picks up more' than 500 outraged comments
(on site and the facebook page) forgetting
describe the purpose of the Directive and the (albeit few) good points
that it introduces in animal research.
More objectively, the directive is a disappointment to those who 's
been waiting for two years and hoped to behave una quasi-
illegalizzazione dei test sugli animali ed un serio coinvolgimento
degli Stati Membri nella promozione di tecniche di ricerca alternative,
e la sua struttura corrisponde a una serie di limiti seguiti da
eccezioni, a volte ragionevoli, a volte no[3].
Il testo, sebbene nettamente meno proibitivo della versione proposta nel 2008 dalla
Commissione fa rientrare nel suo scopo quelle che chiama le tre “R” :
rimpiazzamento (dei test sugli animali con test scientifici
alternativi) riduzione (degli animali utilizzati), e raffinamento
(delle condizioni degli animali prima durante e dopo i test
scientifici.). Un altro punto positivo è il principio sancito all’
Article 2: "Member States may, by observing the general rules
present treaties, to maintain their existing salary, if
aim to ensure more extensive protection of animals
, allowing Italy, a country edge
on protection of animals not to lower their standards and
further promote research methodologies
alternatives to animal testing. But
analyze in detail the issues
"hot" text

What is the meaning and direction of the directive, which should guide the Member States?
Before quoting the contents of the directive, the European Parliament acknowledges
(paragraph 46) that the availability of alternative methods of research
is "highly dependent on the progress of research and development
of these alternatives in order to increase the competitiveness of research and industry
union and replace,
reduce and refine the use of animals in procedures, the Commission and the
States should contribute to research through their own means
towards the development and validation of alternative approaches (
to animal testing), then issues taken up in First. But
is Article 4 ("The principle of replacement, reduction and refinement
") to give the color General Directive:
The States Parties shall ensure that, wherever possible, be satisfying
used scientific methods or tests that do not involve the '
use of live animals.
Member States should ensure that the
number of animals used in projects shall be reduced to a minimum without compromising the objectives of the project
.
Member States should ensure
refinement of farming, accommodation, health and
as the methods used in the procedures
elimination or reduction to a minimum of pain, suffering, distress or pain to animals
permanent
What are the animals subject to scientific test and
quali circostanze?
I paragrafi 2 e 3 dell’articolo 1
prevedono che la direttiva si applicherà ai vertebrati non umani
(inclusi certi tipi di larve e alcuni mammiferi) e cefalopodi.
L'Articolo 5 inquadra invece gli scopi delle procedure di test sugli
animali che sono: ricerca scientifica, ricerca con lo scopo di
prevenzione , diagnosi, condizioni fisiologiche o trattamenti di
malattie, malesseri o i loro effetti su uomini, animali o piante, il
benessere di animali e il miglioramento delle tecniche di produzioni
agricole che richiedono l’utilizzo di animali, nello sviluppo,
manutaffore o test di medicine, cibi, per la protezione dell'ambiente naturale negli interessi health and welfare of human beings or animals, research with a view to the preservation of species,
teaching (moot point also mentioned by the deputy in Alfano
Court), forensic medicine.
Some animals are subject to special protections
, mainly due the fact that
not been bred for the purpose of testing or their rarezza in the natural world:
Article 7 relates to endangered species: these species
can not be used in procedures with the exception of procedures
a limited purpose (research for prevention, diagnosis,
treatment of diseases or health problems, physiological conditions, animal welfare and

improving the situation of animals used in agricultural processes, development and testing of medicines, food,
substances, research with a view to preserving the species) and that the '
use is scientifically justified by the fact that the goal of the procedure can not
be obtained from other animal species.
Article 8 focuses on non-human primates that can not be used in procedures
procedures with the exception of limited purpose
(search for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases or health problems
, physiological conditions, welfare
animals and improving the situation of animals used in processes
agricultural development and testing of medicines, foodstuffs, chemicals
..
all these being valid only if the interests of avoiding, preventing, diagnosing or treating
debilitating or life-threatening medical conditions
in humans but also for research and preservation of the species
). Tests on certain types of primates are
subject to additional restrictions. Article 9 concerns

wild animals, they too can not be used for scientific tests
except for some exceptions (for which, however, the competent authorities must
justificarne the project as not feasible in animals bred for
procedures) .
Article 11 deals with the breeds of animals
domestiche randagi, anche questi non utilizzabili in test a meno che
esista un bisogno essenziale di studi riguardo alla salute e benessere
degli animali o un serio pericolo per l’ambiente o la salute umana o
animale e che sia giusticato scientificamente dal fatto che tale studio
potrebbe concludersi solo con l’utilizzo di animali randagi.
Per quanto
riguarda il punto chiave della controversia, ovvero, la sofferenza
degli annimali e la loro possibile uccisione, la direttiva è molto
dettagliata:
L’articolo 13 descrive la “scelta dei mezzi”. Il secondo
paragrafo precisa che, nel scegliere fra procedimenti devono prevalere
quelli che utilizzano il numero inferiore of animals, causing
less pain, suffering, distress, and that includes animals with less
ability to suffer pain, suffering, distress or suffering permanent.
The death of the animal should be avoided to the fullest extent,
if it is unavoidable, the procedure will result in the deaths of as
number of animals possible, reduce the duration and intensity of
animal suffering and bring them to a minimum -
if possible - a painless death.
Article 14 regulates that
anesthesia should be used - unless unsuitable -
in cases of mild to moderate pain. If experiments involving series
injury or pain is absolutely mandatory. Animals showing
suffering even after the test should be given analgesics or sedatives
animal, at the end of the procedure, must be treated in order to make any
minimal pain.
Article 6, however, specify the methods for killing
: States must ensure the minimum
suffering and discomfort for the animal (in an annex of
disconcerting precision).

[1] Available in English at this link:
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/10/st06/st06106.en10.pdf

[2] Among other things, with all respect for the republic, the very title of the article
is wrong: there is a substantial difference in
definition of "scientific tests" (which include
sottoministrazione of medicine) to "vivisection (dissection and
surgery on an animal)

[3] The deputy IDV Sonia Alfano
noted several times that the text provides the ability to reuse
an animal several times for tests and
use animals in experiments for educational purposes.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Mexican Lookig Dinnerware

approved the law on vivisection: Europe takes a step back

Admission experiments on stray

VIRGILIO
NEWS September 9, 2010 The new Law on vivisection. Allowed In experiments on stray
protests and controversy,
launched the new EU directive on animal testing. Permissible in special cases
on stray dogs and cats and chimpanzees. Every year 12 million
of animals used for scientific experiments


The final text adopted in Strasbourg gave rise to many controversies, forty
MEPs left the Chamber and the indignant response of
animal was immediate.
Michael Kuan, National Lav
argues that the text adopted is disappointing, especially with the
scientific advances and the emergence of alternatives to the use of animals
.
even harder the position of League antivivisection
(Leal), who warns: "A law is a measure of Vivisector,
not obliged to use alternative methods to test the animals
even where they exist." The association of all the reports
'concessions' to the science labs with reference to articles
the new law, listing practices worthy of the mind of Hannibal Lecter
.
Among the most controversial points of the measure, there is
openness to experimentation on dogs and stray cats, if the purpose of scientific
not be reached otherwise (Article 11);
Notwithstanding the use of non-human primates (monkeys anthropomorphic, art. 55);
the trial without anesthesia or analgesia if the researchers
consider appropriate (Article 14). What worries the most

champions of animal rights is the fact that the new legislation,
likely to be even more violent: the clarification
experiments that involve fewer animals should not deceive the
zoophilic, as the text also specifies that the experiment on the same guinea pig
can be repeated several times, if the intensity is "moderate." Each year in Europe
twelve million animals are used for research purposes
. One statistic that does not take into account the
invertebrate species and use of animals killed for tissues and organs.
In our country, the obligation to transpose the European standard
could worsen the situation of many domestic mammals, unless
not be interpreted in a more restrictive maintaining the poles
currently in force in Italy, where the law on vivisection
is more rigid.
Between the lines of the new legislation is
who sees the influence of the lobby of multinational drug companies, which would
lobbied to open loopholes in a bill
designed with the intention of reducing the suffering of the mice and
to strengthen controls on laboratories.


favor of or opposed to vivisection?
VOTE http://notizie.virgilio.it/community/dilatua/sondaggio.html?2316


the law passed
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/cls/cons_cons % 282010 2906106%%% 28rev1 29_/cons_cons% 282010 2906106%%% 28rev1 29_it. pdf

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Dog With Prolapsed Womb Why

The Kissexy to Lesa on August 1 - two videos!

For those who on 1 August was not there and who was there and wanted to see them again here next to you can download two videos of the concert.

Watch Kates Playground Itouch

Thursday, September 9 at 18 is the City Council

Thursday, September 9 at 18 is the City Council. Only three points on the agenda:

- reviewing and approving the Convention for the granting of the football field

- reviewing and approving municipal regulation for the pursuit of a hairdresser and beautician
- City Council ratified a resolution of n .106 "changes in budget - financial year 2010
is not a long session, nor particularly challenging given that exceptionally It was agreed to bring together our questions, motions, etc.. in a new session already scheduled for September 28 at 21.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Portable Flatbed Scanner

first penalty for wrongful death to an animal complaint invested

September 3, 2010 CITY
Invests dog and not to his aid
Fine: 389 €
Legnaro (PD) - has invested a dog, you are not stopped and continued on his way . The driver of a Mini Cooper
has been identified and fined 389 euro fine, as
provides a specific law on the wrongful death for a pet
invested. It shall inform the association 100% animals
Padua who underlines the first time in Italy that is
applied this sanction.
The event took place today at Legnaro (Padova) and the dog
invested, despite the rescue, then died. The Mini had invested
the dog but the driver had stopped, leaving the poor animal
dying on the road. Some passers-
witnessed the scene, marked the plate investor el'hanno
delivered to the police who quickly identified the
car owner by applying the expected fine.


VIRGILIO NEWS 3 September 2010
Padova, invests and dog will not stop: shoot the first penalty in Italy
of 389 €, is the first case failed to animal rescue
has invested a mutt and did not stop to help him : has been imposed on a pensioner of 60 years in Legnaro, Padua
in the first penalty for wrongful death against
an animal ever done in Italy. A hefty fine from € 389. The
the newspaper 'The Morning' di Padova: the man has invested a
mongrel dog, Rocky, and did not help: the animal died a few hours after
. Some passers-by, including the owner of the dog, have marked the
plate number and reported the fact to the police, who have
identified and sanctioned for violating Article 189/bis
of the highway code. The rule reads: "The road user, in case of accident, however
reconnect it to its behavior, which
resulting damage to one or more pets, farm or protected, has the obligation to stop and
to implement all appropriate measures to ensure early intervention
rescue
animals that have suffered the damage. " The penalty can range from 389 to 1559 €.


THE XIX CENTURY September 4, 2010
invests a dog and run. The first sixty years of fine
padova sanctioned for failure to assist
Driving Under the new code was required to stop. must pay 389 €
PADOVA. Invests a dog and darting away. A 60 year old
of Legnaro (Padova) was fined: 389 € for
well after an accident. Sanctioned under the new code
road, which entered into force a month ago.
The new law provides that 'the road user, in case of accident, however
reconnect it to his behavior, and resulting in damage to one or more
pets, farm or protected, has the obligation to stop
and to implement all appropriate measures to ensure early intervention
rescue animals that have suffered the damage. "
the penalty can range from 389 to 1559 €. The affair has given the association news
100% animal of Padua
stressed that it is the first time in Italy that this sanction is applied. The
invested dog, Rocky, and died despite the rescue.
Some passers-by witnessed the scene and reported the license plate to police
who quickly identified the owner of the car by applying a fine
provided. The driver of the Mini had,
fact, over the dog but not stopped, leaving the poor animal
dying on the road.


THE ZAMPA.IT September 4, 2010
over the dog and does not stop, a senior fine the first senior Al
minimum penalty of 389 €
PADOVA - has invested a mongrel dog and did not stop to help him: for this reason a senior
of sixty, in Legnano, in Padua, was imposed a fine
(389 €) for wrongful death against a
animal. It 's the first time in Italy a penalty is applied
for this type of crime.
The story was told by the newspaper
'The Morning' in Padua: the man has invested a half-breed dog, Rocky, and
left him seriously injured on the ground. The animal died a few hours after
. Some passers-by, including the owner of the dog, have marked the number
plate and complained to the police, who have
identified and sanctioned for violating Article 189/bis
of the highway code. The rule provides: 'The road user, in case of accident, however
reconnect it to its behavior, which may give rise
damage to one or more pets, farm or protected, has the' duty to stop and
implement all measures necessary to ensure a timely intervention
rescue animals that have suffered the damage
. Was applied to the pensioner the minimum penalty of 389 €;
the maximum is € 1,559.